Blog :: Gallery :: Portal :: Wedding :: Gear Friday, November 21st, 2008
Those that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. - Benjamin Franklin
Links
Search


Recent Entries
Monthly Archives
Post Notification
Enter your email address to be notified when a new post is made to this site.
Wish List
Tip Jar

Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More
Blogger Code
Powered By

General Links & Counters
Listed on BlogShares

The following addresses are spamtraps. Do not use them or you will be banned from hundreds of web sites

Webmaster Editor Sales
Harvester Project


September 14, 2004
Broadband in the campaign

Today's Wall Street Journal carries a story on one of the current topics that both presidential candidates have been discussing for awhile, Broadband Access for All ($).

For months, President Bush and his Democratic challenger, Sen. John Kerry, have been one-upping each other about the necessity for ubiquitous broadband and how to achieve it. But for all the rhetoric, the two candidates aren't far apart and both duck a central issue: Should a nationwide broadband rollout be subsidized by the government?

Industry executives, who by early August had contributed nearly $11 million to the presidential candidates, are pushing for a national broadband policy to speed adoption of the technology. Countries with such policies, including South Korea and Canada, have used government funds to boost subscription rates, and the technology industry wants the U.S. to do the same.

While I think subsidies are the wrong way to go in this case, the system needs to be deregulated. South Korea is where it is today in broadband usage because of the way they deregulated their telco system in the 1970's and 80's. While this result in a per-minute charge for even local phone calls, it allowed for the neccessary infrastructure to be developed for the current broadband they have in use (Graphic of countries with top broadband usage). As the story points out they get over 3 million bits per second on transfer rates. My best connections are only around 400k bits per second and usually around 100k bits per second.

Posted by Chris Short at 12:41 PM
Tangled Web We Weave

And whoever was the source of this deception has probably put the last dozen nails in the coffin of Dan Rather's career. As I don't have much to add to the current coverage of Rathergate, I'm just going to direct the view readers I have that probably haven't been paying attention to this to some sites for more information.

First up, Blogs for Bush has updated their Web of Connections by releaseing the Forged Documents Version. For the blog that broke the story, go to Powerline. A new weblog, RatherGate.com has been started to keep track of this and is running a petition drive.
Then you can check out these other fine blogs for more information as well: Instapundit, Wizbang (which has gems like this), and Stephen Green at VodkaPundit has quite a few items, and more if you go to about half the list on the left.

 
ShortDaddy - Ruminations and funny stuff