Many law school grads were in for a big shock this spring. After being told that they passed the bar exam that they took this past winter, it has been discovered that the Multistate Bar Exam was misgraded. Some law school grads that were told that they had passed may have indeed failed the exam. The testing company responsible for grading the exams gave credit for one question to some people that had answered it incorrectly. With 20,000 people taking the exam across the country, the misgrading could effect a reasonably large number of people. Ohio has postponed the swearing in of all the grads that scored the minimum required score while Massachusetts has announced that they will regrade their exams.
This is the first, and hopefully the last, time in 16 years that a mistake has occured. I know I don’t want to deal with this when the time comes for me to take the bar exam.
(via Lawschool.com)
UPDATE - Well, I’ve now had my first Instapundit link. Welcome to the site everyone.
Redman asks about the flipside of the coin, whether people failed that should have passed. The answer is yes. Those that answered the question correctly had the answer counted as incorrect.
ANOTHER UPDATE - Kimberly Swygert writes about her concerns regarding the fairness of lowing scores based on errors of the testing company.
Posted by Chris Short at May 07, 2003 02:49 PM3 Comments
Redman
May 7, 2003 4:59 PM
What about the other side of the coin? Did anybody get a "failed" notice who actually might have passed?
Sialia
May 7, 2003 7:02 PM
Oh Shit!!! I took the Feb. exam and they told me I passed. Ark. doesn't give scores for those who passed so I don't know what I made. Although the formal swearing in ceremony is this Friday, I have already been sworn in by a judge and paid my fees so officially I'm a lawyer. But still...
carl
May 8, 2003 2:38 PM
This isn't the first time Ohio's re-graded its bar exam. Last time, they didn't catch it FOR FIVE YEARS. See, e.g., In re February 1986 Ohio Bar Examination Applicant No. 83, 60 Ohio St. 3rd 602 (1991). The nearby pages of that Ohio reporter are filled with identical decisions involving different named applicants.

